The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in European country from 2005 to 2008.
The given column graph illustrates the information about three methods of treatment of waste which used by UK between 2005 and 2008.
Overall, it is clear that during 2005 and 2006 landfill was very popular. However, most of the wastage was disposed by using dumping method during 2008.
To begin with, during 2005, about 2000 million tonnes of waste disposed by filling in land. Whereas, only 9 hundred million tonnes treated by burning. While amount of waste dumped into the sea was 300 million tonnes more than burning. In following year, waste treated by landfill declined rapidly and reached at 16 hundred million tonnes. In contrast, the use of burning method for waste treatment followed by a rising trend in which amount of waste increased by three hundred million tonnes.
Probing further, 14 hundred million tonnes of waste disposed by dumping in the sea which was two hundred million tonnes more than earlier year. Till 2008, the waste which used to treat by landfill remained only 1200 million tonnes. It is interesting to note that the amount of waste which disposed by dumping followed by a dramatic incline and reached at 1600 million tonnes. By contrast, in case of waste treated by burning decreased by three hundred since 2008
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Anjuakhil | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | Mishika sugandhi | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | Thu Phung | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-27 | Khshbhman | 67 | view |
- Some people say that in our modern Age it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- The two charts show the percentage of pollutants entering part of ocean in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 82
- The charts below give Information about travel to and from the UK, a nd about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 56
- The use of mobile phones is antisocial like smoking. Smoking is banned on many places. Mobiles phones should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- The chart below shows information about the favourite subject of 60students from two schools 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng 2008. To begin with, during 2005, about 2000 million tonnes of waste dispo...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s of waste disposed by filling in land. Whereas, only 9 hundred million tonnes treated ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dred million tonnes treated by burning. While amount of waste dumped into the sea was...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to note that the amount of waste which disposed by dumping followed by a dramat...
^^
Line 7, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by burning decreased by three hundred since 2008
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28507850083 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.556300496 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0833333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190174474265 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884894478076 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578608033837 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146602206816 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526951230461 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.