The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps present the transformation of Stokeford area over 80 years from 1930 to 2010. Overall, all the lands which had been used for farming were replaced with residential houses and a lot of branches were developed from the small path in this village.
To the north of the map, the bridge, the primary school, and the post office still remained in the old location. However, those shops were on the left side of the post office and the farmland locating in the eastern north of the map were converted into residential buildings. In 2010, two large houses were built next to the primary school.
To the rest of the map, in 1930 when Stokeford hardly saw any residential houses here are now filled with a lot of those. The land used for farming purposes in this side also had been destroyed as the farm in the north of the map. In 2010, a retirement house was built on the site where gardens used to be. Besides, the biggest tree in this garden had been cut out to be redesigned as residential areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the changes that took places in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 to 2012 61
- the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 84
- the charts below shows the annual number of rentals and rentals and sales (in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51366120219 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36255236499 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4697209762 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111033065205 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555977475556 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525578534907 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782677904405 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190100701979 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.