The bar chart below shows the average monthly maximum temperatures for three Australian cities in the year 2016. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar diagram gives information about the average monthly peak temperature in three Australian cities (namely Melbourne, Darwin, and Perth) in the year 2016. The units are measured in degree Celsius.
Overall, Darwin was the hottest of them all, throughout the year, with a minimal variation of less than three degrees between different months of the year, whereas Melbourne was found to be relatively cooler than the other two cities at any given month in the year, and it also experienced the greatest variation in peak temperature throughout the year.
Discussing the further details, the hottest months for Darwin was November when the temperature reached to 33.3 degrees. On the other hand, July was found to be coldest with a maximum average temperature of 30.5 degree Celsius. The other months of the year ranged between 30.5 – 33.3 degrees.
Furthermore, Melbourne and Perth followed similar trends of rise and fall in peak temperature across the year. Like Darwin, January was the hottest months for both these cities with a peak of 25.8 and 28.1 degrees respectively, and July was the coldest with a maximum of 13.3 and 18.8 degrees respectively. Throughout the year, Melbourne was cooler than Perth, except in the month of March, when both these cities had the same peak temperature of 23.8 degree Celsius.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-01 | utkarshshahi | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to broadcast foreign films and TV show. Others, however, think it is best to produce local films and shows. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The following is a diagram of a mobile phone recycling process.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- As the world becomes technologically advanced computers are replacing people at more jobs What are some job positions that may be lost because of computers What are some problems that may result from this situation 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museum outweigh its advantage? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.133640553 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59205017663 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47465437788 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.9974159819 43.030603864 200% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.777777778 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219834901007 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106164651468 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830039160772 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166506433126 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662279034107 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.