The trend of nuclear weapon accepted by many countries and they say that it is use for produce energy. But it is provide clean and cheap power inspite of maintain the world peace. I totally disagree with it. This essay will discuss all the aspects in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, many countries develop nuclear power as a security purpose because they know well about its dangoures effect. Moreover, it is highly hazardous not only for citizens also for a nation. It can be destroy a country whithin a minutes if people used it wrongly. Additionally, it is used to take revenge by one country to another country. For example, in Japan there was nuclear weapon leakage and countless human had died, everyone can never forget that incident and all well known about that.
Moving further, its advantage are, it is provide electercity several people and nuclear power do not effct the environment. Furthermore, nuclear energy do not emit greenhouse gases in surrounding areas. It helps to burn fossil fuel also. However, nuclear weapon are powerful defence to their own country.
To conclude, it is ganually dangrous for a country and can destroy the whole nation. People needs to be aware on it and used it for energy purpose.
- The graphs show below the post school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69. 67
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM)crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Interfering with nature in this way should be proh 61
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Most people in the world have to work to earn a living However many people work only for the financial gain that it involves and not for any other rewards that a job can offer what do u think the main considerations when deciding what job to take should b 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...it is use for produce energy. But it is provide clean and cheap power inspite of mainta...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all the aspects in upcoming paragraphs. To commence with, many countries develop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...oving further, its advantage are, it is provide electercity several people and nuclear ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ing areas. It helps to burn fossil fuel also. However, nuclear weapon are powerful d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94258373206 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53368144745 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626794258373 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 379.143842365 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7166963831 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.8666666667 104.977214359 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9333333333 20.9669160288 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248401660565 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828558956575 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962990438248 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157315506486 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117141877138 0.0609392437508 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 12.6369458128 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.