More and more people work at home and study at home with the development of computer technology. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, as a result of advanced computer technology, many people are working and studying at their homes instead of traditional workplaces. In my opinion, this is a positive development as it brings more benefits to individuals and societies.
The first reason for considering working and studying online a beneficial trend is that it effectively aids many people to save their time. This is mainly because people who are working or studying from their home do not need to travel to their work or universities every day, which is a time-consuming process. By preserving this time, online workers can concentrate more on developing themselves and their work, and online students can have more time for their homework. In addition, because online workers and students have got more free time, they can dedicate more of their time to their families and friends, resulting in more tight and healthy society. Therefore, as more people work and study at home, more development at the individual level can be achieved.
Another point to consider is that working and studying online contributes enormously to solving many problems from which most of the modern communities are suffering. For example, traffic congestion, which is a main issue in most of the major cities, can be alleviated by encouraging more people to work and study online, decreasing the number of cars and buses that transport them every day. Moreover, environmental problems attributed to the rise in the number of cars can also be tackled by having more employees and students who work and study online. Eventually, in order to tackle some of the serious problems that modern societies are encountering, working and studying online seems a reasonable solution.
In conclusion, working and studying at homes is a positive trend of development as it save people’s time, and plays a predominant role in solving urgent issues, such as traffic congestion and environmental pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-04 | ChienHung CHEN | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-04 | ChienHung CHEN | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-04 | ChienHung CHEN | 61 | view |
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- More and more people work at home and study at home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefits to individuals and societies. The first reason for considering working...
^^^
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... online. Eventually, in order to tackle some of the serious problems that modern societies ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26198083067 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94808382448 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488817891374 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.2315086937 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.25 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385543092927 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170379503556 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125935460066 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27200657687 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956736322018 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.