The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of seats filled in Wright Brother's airways in 2005, 2010, and 2015. There are different fare classes such as the economy, premium economy, business, and first which is compared.
Overall, the premium economy is the most preferred class, the economy and first class is the second most popular class. Notably, the business class seats peaked during 2005 but dropped significantly in the following years.
In 2005, the business class was the most popular fare class with nearly 90% of seats occupied, then the premium economy class which constituted around 85%. The first and economy classes shared nearly four-fifths of the seats. In contrast, the business class was the least preferred option in 2010. Premium economy skyrocketed with 95%; whereas the first and economy classes shared the same figures around 80%.
In 2015, the premium economy class was at the peak and shared the same numbers as in 2010, followed by the economy and first class with values around 90% and 85% respectively. Finally, the business class was preferred by almost three-quarters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | Blackcytrus | view | |
| 2020-08-21 | Titi2lope | 44 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | SaranyaJeevesh | 11 | view |
- The diagram illustrates the way milk, cheese, cream and butter are produced, processed and packaged for sale to consumers 73
- ake a look at the graphic and complete the task The table and chart show data from a survey of library users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The increase in the number of obese person is costing so much money to the health care system. 73
- The bar graph illustrates the number of people who used public transport in a town between 2011 and 2015. 78
- The table and chart show data from a survey of library users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, then, whereas, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27683615819 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48620953074 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468926553672 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8113886139 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0507228158159 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304744565408 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281312058573 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.041273887247 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205234554861 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.