Many countries want to improve standard of living through economic development, however, others think social value is lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages?
From zero to one, or more specifically, from creating a blueprint to finishing the construction, now the process for developing a new business district may merely take as long as five years. As a citizen living in a metropolis, you will no longer surprise that a new skyscraper project begins construction just one month after another one was completed. Whether this phenomenon is positive or negative for the society as a whole is controversial. It seems plausible that its advantage is apparent; however, after deliberation, we may notice some downsides as well.
Many people would think it is fortunate for a country to have rapid development in economy. For one thing, an economic boom allows the government to have more funds for social welfare, such as education, medical services, and environmental protection. People will feel happy and satisfied with such improvement. For another, the income of its citizens will increase as well, so that people can buy themselves private cars to travel around, home appliances to free them of household chores, and a larger house to enjoy the life after work.
While the benefits of fast economic growth seem obvious, there are some pitfalls too. To be specific, people will probably become materialistic. In modern time, prosperity in business is often achieved by consumerism: companies persuade people to buy products or services which are in fact unnecessary for them, and they also encourage people to replace all their old clothes, decorations, and electronic devices with new ones. Under such influence, people will gradually justify waste in daily life and consider consumption is the only way leading them to happiness. In addition, people may become immoral during chasing economic profits. It is often reported that to<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> </span>reduce<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> cost </span>many companiesuse substandard materials in production, and <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">t</span>o<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> get their commission </span>sales staff will make an empty promise to their customers. In a word, overemphasizing economic interest contributes to moral decay.
To summarize, it is difficult to draw a conclusion that the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages. Admittedly, neither our society nor individuals will have improvement without enough financial support; however, having higher incomes and living standards do not always promise happiness and peace among the society. Therefore, the government had better ensure that its moral education and legislation keep pace with its economic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-13 | Imagine Ho | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | zentirot | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-28 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-28 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
- Many countries want to improve standard of living through economic development, however, others think social value is lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To be successful in business, companies must put more money in advertising. 73
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think most crimes are the result of circumstances like poverty and other social problems. Others believe that they are caused by people who are bad in nature. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in fact, such as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84693877551 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.78774561817 2.80592935109 135% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635204081633 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.231163407 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144278682834 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519044340164 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563973887553 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964488121839 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635027152774 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.