Small town center shops are running out of their businesses because rural residents tend to go shopping in big cities store. To what extent do the advantages of this development outweigh the advantages?
In recent time, it is undeniable fact that more people from countryside choose large shopping malls of metropolis for purchasing things rather than the village centric market which results in dying out of small businesses. Though this serves the purposes of customers in terms of benefits but downside of this situation is more prominent which will be discussed throughout this essay.
Firstly, this type of city based purchasing mentality would be beneficial for both buyer, who love shopping from super shops, and shopkeepers of large shops which is totally converse for small business person from villages. One stop shopping place where all required items, from groceries to clothing, are available under one roof and offers on several products such as – buy one get one free and low costs of products are the best possible advantages that customers can avail at large markets. Undoubtedly business of metropolitan cities are flourishing like never before and a huge value growth is observed in this areas which has a large impact on development and infrastructure of society.
On the flip side, no visible improvement has been occurred to the rustic places of a country as less influx of currency in the rural business sector. Not only no economic change will happen in near future if this situation persists for long but also the living standard of rural dwellers will be reduced over time. At the same time, movement of more citizens contribute to chaotic environment and traffic congestion. Finally, to some extent, they unconsciously compel the peasant traders to shut down their business due to less movement of customers and this ultimately leads to a huge economic gap between city and countryside residents.
As such it can be concluded that the buying habit of country people has a great impact on our society’s development and we must turn this trend into a positive thing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-26 | Mariamirabella | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-16 | Tania007 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 613, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... and a huge value growth is observed in this areas which has a large impact on devel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11575562701 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72526960616 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614147909968 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1623222986 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.1 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190241564075 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661895991083 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370152895573 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982317082783 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404763568954 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.