Why do we need to prevent the extinction of some animals like dinosaurs and dodos if it is caused by natural processes? What is your opinion about this?
There is no doubt that it is our duty to save the rare species of animals (dinosaurs and dodos) for study and research purposes in times ahead. While there are some who believe, it is necessary to control their disappearance from Earth due to environmental effects. I do not completely agree with this view and would support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, researchers have concluded that it is not advisable to prevent the death of these animals. This is because, some of these species like dinosaurs are dangerous predators, which can harm human life at any moment. For example, I believe these creatures are carrier for many rare diseases, which in turn could lead to epidemics in times to come. As a result, many precautions are undertaken when handling these species. In contrast, since these rare species are wonders of nature, they should be preserved as an example for future generations.
On the other hand, I believe that these species should be preserved and studied upon by scientists. The reason is that, we can know about many facts related to pre historic era by analysing these beasts. For example, study done by the UK news channel - BBC reported about few rare species of non- carnivorous dinosaurs which were not a threat for co-existing animals. However, animals have a natural aggressive instinct so an unforeseen act could become catastrophic for people handling them. As a result, they need to be held up in safe confines away from public interactions, in order to prevent any accidents. Nevertheless, I believe that every creature can have freedom of existence, so measures should be undertaken to help them survive regardless of their ferocity.
In conclusion, although animal species are dangerous and threat for society, personally I believe they are creations of God and should be given a fair chance of existence and not extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | nehatshahi | 92 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | nehatshahi | 79 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | nehatshahi | 61 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honor,kindness and trust no longer seems important. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 11
- The government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children, rather than on professional sports and art performance for the general public.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03514376997 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80467493101 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578274760383 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4015649021 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126077262704 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411507011401 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372472818331 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745552934885 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340167217086 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.