Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.
Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?
Technology has made tremendous progress in various fields around the globe. It has been a boon to the society. The field of science has benefitted extensively by this progression. One of the best examples of the technological advancement is the invention of new medicines and cure of many deadly diseases. The diseases that were once considered non curable like rubella, measle and polios; are easily prevented at young age because of vaccines. But, the question is; should parents have liberty of not immunizing their children or government should have standard law for all the children to be immunized regarding common disease.
I believe the decisions of parents are affected by many factors. Uneducated parents might not be aware of the importance of immunization and might end up not giving their child vaccines that are necessary and thus risking the life of their children to vulnerable diseases. Some parents might opt out and not give immunization due to sheer negligence towards their children without realizing its future effects. On the other hand few parents to save money would not immunize their children.
If government would make immunization as compulsion for everyone, it would not only benefit the entire society but also reduce the death rate of children being affected by those diseases. Parents should be educated that rather wasting money and curing the disease later, it is advisable to take precautions at earlier stage through vaccination. Parents should be informed about the damages that these disease could lead, and also how preventing it through vaccination is the only solution.
To conclude, as it is said ‘Prevention is better than cure’, parents should be made aware importance of the immunization and also make it compulsion so that no child is affected through these deadly diseases. Government and school could work hand in hand in encouraging the parents to immunize their children who are the future of tomorrow.
- Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment, but population and education as wellWhat problems will your country face in the next ten years?How can these problems be overcome?Give reasons for your 69
- More and more people are opting for ready-made food instead of freshly cooked food. Do this development has more advantages over disadvantages? 61
- More people are spending their free time watching movies.Why is this?Is it a good thing or bad thing? 79
- Some people think that watching sport is wastage of time during leisure time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption, while others think that it is individuals responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views a 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this disease' or 'these diseases'?
Suggestion: this disease; these diseases
...ould be informed about the damages that these disease could lead, and also how preventing it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'hand in'.
Suggestion: hand in
...ases. Government and school could work hand in hand in encouraging the parents to immunize the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hildren who are the future of tomorrow.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26984126984 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84465347871 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1559066236 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358706278282 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109644088222 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844510254373 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22287480788 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326310299451 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.