Some people think it is better for children to grown up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable for them. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both places?

It is believed in certain quarters that living in a city better for kids that in the countryside, while others strongly disagree with this opinion. In this essay, the pros and cons of both places will be analyzed before a logical conclusion is drawn.

People who believe that towns are a more convenient place for growing children than rural area often put toward principal argument: a town provide more qualified education for kids than the countryside. Schools in a town have high-quality teachers compare with villages. In addition, schools in a town provide a wide range of additional activities after regular lessons. Nevertheless, living in a modern town might be harmful to children because of the air pollution that leads to serious health problems such as asthma or allergy. Thus, it is clear that cities providing a high standard of education might be inconvenient for children with a tendency to certain health problems mentioned before.

On the other hand, some people support the idea that living in the countryside much more beneficial for kids than city life. Firstly, kids in a rural area spend plenty of time outside playing with neighboring peers. In addition, playing outside they spend time in a car fresh environment. Therefore, youngsters growing up much healthier and stronger than kids in a town. Nevertheless, a range of amenities and facilities that town can offer for children are unavailable in the countryside. Therefore, some families prefer growing up children in a town.

In conclusion, as the above shows, both point of view has advantages and disadvantages. Cities provide a better education for children, while the countryside provides a much healthier environment. At the same time, the former has serious problems with air pollution, wheres rural area suffer from a shortage of modern infrastructure for people.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: where's
...as serious problems with air pollution, wheres rural area suffer from a shortage of mo...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24161073826 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91646069484 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8327744953 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23775886188 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790733059723 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728697395642 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152142146506 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228290445763 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.