The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project.
This bar graph illustrates data about the Grandville Stadium´s attendance in 2017 and the attendance that would be expected in the years 2020 and 2030 due to the renovation is going to be carried out this year. This chart brings the projections of attendance depending the different activity the stadium hosts.
In the category of theatre, there was in 2017 an audience of 10,000 people and it would increase a bit in 2020 and there would be a great rise in 2030 reaching to 50000 people.
Talking about sporting events, here is where it shows projected a lower increase. The audience registered in 2017 was near to 150,000, and it would increase aproximately 10,000 people until 2030.
However, where the improvement seems to be going to leave a mark it is in concert´s category. In 2017 there was about 25,000 people and it would have a really sharp increase reaching more than 125,000 people in 2030
Overall, it is seen that the reform will get a growth in the audience as it shows there is a gradual upward trend, but it would not be in the same strength regarding on the event the stadium hosts
- Many of the problems young people now experience like Juvenile delinquency arise from the fact that many married women work and are not at home to look after their children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project. 73
- Essay topics: The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.»You should write at least 150 words.Figures (in thous 11
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, regarding, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6627979827 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517948717949 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.3347587871 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170183867007 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895744037769 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605423685918 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899484298685 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065917461354 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.