Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Living nowadays in a continuous bustle and hustle could be the reason on being very focused to not waste any time, only spending it on relevant purposes and living the present at full. I support this idea strongly, the fact is that believing that past it is now worth at all by far is the point I do not agree and I am going to explain why.

First of all, I think previous experiences can express more than it could seem, due to under a failure or mistake, there is something below, an useful learning that could teach us relevant values for the rest of our lives. For example, after a breakup, you should not spend more time than the deserved to think over it, but you can take concern of your behaviour in order to improve it for future situations.

For this reason, you should review what you have undergone or how you have acted for learning purposes, thus realising your mistakes should be the way to avoid their performance the next time. But as far I remark the relevance of this facts, I consider that these experiences should be valued in a balanced weigh, because living the present should be our main goal, unless we do not want to reach happiness.

To conclude, I point out the significance of valuing experiences and provided their positive approaching to stop us repeating that errors the day of tomorrow, but as well assuring that staying that staying in the present should be our main mentality and that includes regretting as less as we could.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-13 Adeola Nafisat 61 view
2020-01-11 Adeola Nafisat 73 view
2020-01-05 pbansal 67 view
2019-12-06 marin123 61 view
2019-12-06 marin123 61 view
Essays by user alvaro123321 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e or mistake, there is something below, an useful learning that could teach us rel...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e. But as far I remark the relevance of this facts, I consider that these experience...
^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'that staying'.
Suggestion: that staying
...e day of tomorrow, but as well assuring that staying that staying in the present should be our main menta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ty and that includes regretting as less as we could.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, well, for example, i think, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58935361217 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47515959334 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58174904943 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5599217431 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.428571429 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5714285714 20.7667163134 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227839772526 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988279888968 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263504090658 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124730522472 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382648291109 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.