Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words
Learning is vital in acquiring knowledge about the past and present moment. It is generally believed by some people that seeking information about the past if of no benefit to today's world. While i partially agree with this assertion because it is a waste of resources, I believe learning about the past helps to conserve our culture.
To begin, studying about past events is considered a complete waste of time and resources because the way of living in the modern world is entirely distinct from the ancient times. It is apparent that the recent world have advanced greatly with the inception of science and technology, therefore, learning from the archaic practices of the old time is so irrelevant. In addition, there are diverse worrisome issues such as, pollution, climate changes and overpopulation in the present times, this devastating conditions should be research into, instead of ancient findings. Ignoring these pressing issues for the past times is equivalent to misplacing our priorities.
Conversely, it is essential to inquire about history because it preserves our culture. Unarguably, the development of technology is driving our culture into extinction. Culture defines our way of life because it gives sense of identity, however, most people have limited knowledge of it. Is the knowledge of historical moment valuable? Undoubtedly yes, It does not only provide us with information of how the human race evolved, it as well help the civilized appreciate growth. Considering these reasons, the knowledge of culture is pertinent to today's world.
In conclusion, I somewhat disagree with the view that learning historical moment is not of advantageous to our present times. Although, there are disturbing issues in the current world that should be studied, I suggest that people should learn about the past times because it preserves our culture in recent times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Adeola Nafisat | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | Adeola Nafisat | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | pbansal | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | marin123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | marin123 | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 67
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words 73
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words 61
- Some people think that the government should take care of the disadvantaged people such as unemployed and homeless people.To what extent do u agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38127090301 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84751921473 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528428093645 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8731621862 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152827393386 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567801383849 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388673319305 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10234643727 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343617611003 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.