In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.
Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?
Although waste can easily be converted in to useful materials, recycling of garbage is not often practiced by people of several nations. This could be as a result of some reasons which will be analyzed in this essay as well as measures to amend this stance.
There are diverse reasons for people not recycling their materials. Perhaps, the most compelling being lack of knowledge. People possess little or no information about how or which items are to be reprocessed. A survey carried out by Federal waste management systems of Nigeria in 2017 revealed that 60 percent of the populace are unware of the items to be recycled while 13 percent of them have not heard of recycling. As such, low utilization of recycling process is due to inadequate details of the benefits and how it should be done.
Consequently, having considered why recycling of used items is not done by people, which measures can be taken? The media can be of good advantage. Details of where, how and what to be recycled should be aired to the hearings of the populace. Also, various initiatives should create fliers, billboards to disseminate information about the benefits of recycling to the people and its environment. Lastly, incentives can be offered to people that recycles thes used items regularly. This will not only influence them positively, they would be motivated.
To sum up, the media has a cogent role to play in ensuring people are well-informed of the details and merits of recycling, as lack of necessary information is one of the factors why people do not convert their waste to useful items.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.Write a report for a university teacher describing the information sh 67
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words 73
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe children who are taught to cooperate becomes more useful adult. 61
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in every day life.what are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns? 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stance. There are diverse reasons for people not recycling their materials...
^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e possess little or no information about how or which items are to be reprocessed...
^^
Line 13, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia has a cogent role to play in ensuring people are well-informed of the details ...
^^
Line 13, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the details and merits of recycling, as lack of necessary information is one of...
^^
Line 13, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ils and merits of recycling, as lack of necessary information is one of the fact...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, lastly, so, well, while, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94795539033 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79550442911 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6699279349 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0714285714 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321578640468 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113098324826 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494661506995 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194511803808 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619267050649 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.