The two pie charts illustrate the percentile of British students at one university in England who were able to communicate other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it is crystal clear from the pie charts that a substantial proportion of students who were able to speak Spanish whereas the least proportion of these students could speak German language during a decade.
To begin with, it can be seen that the percentage of students who could not speak other language were decreased halfly from 20% to 10% throughout the given period. Similarly, the proportion of students speaking French language was plummet from 15% to 10% in 2010 whereas the percentage of speaking German language remained same that was 10% in both years.
Nearly, the percentage of students speaking Spanish was the most significant language as compared to other languages which increased from 30 to 35% in 2010. The similar trend was followed by another language and two other languages, with 5% increased in both languages between 2000 and 2010.
- Far too little has been done to prevent animals and plants from dying out although people have been aware of this problem for a long time Why do people do so little about it Give your suggestion on how to solve this problem 84
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. Do you think it is positive or negative 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 89
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some people say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 84
Hlo sir, can u tell me where
Hlo sir, can u tell me where m wrong and which mistake m doing again and again.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
1. Don't repeat words like: 'who were able to...'
2. more difficult words wanted:
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 172 200
No. of Characters: 852 1000
No. of Different Words: 88 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.621 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.953 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.672 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 63 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.19 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.552 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.854 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.235 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13372093023 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66795857812 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.4389246803 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 147.166666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378119361139 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216630391383 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131495187671 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27269458519 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133223711259 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.