Online education is becoming more and more popular. Some people claim that e-learning has so many benefits that it will replace face-to-face education soon. Others say that traditional education is irreplaced.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent decade, distance learning is gaining massive popularity. Individuals believe that it has a lot of advantages so that traditional classes will no longer be used. By contrast, others urged that this case is impossible. In my opinion, I am in favor of the second statements.
On the one hand, today, online education with the aid of breakthrough technologies has been being widespread all over the world. This kind of classes guarantee a flexible timetable for the participants. It is very useful for people who must work their way through university. For example, If students have to work in daytime, they could take the lesson at night or anytime they are available. Moreover, online education are supposed to be outweigh due to it does not require people to come to school or a location. Therefore, people can be more proactive to study anywhere they can. For instance, It is possible for them to join a trip with their family, concurrently, no need to skip any class.
On the other hand, it is certainly true that traditional learning methods have become standard of our educational system so far. The transmission of knowledge in face-to-face interaction could help students cover a lot of ground thank to its imposed discipline. It is obvious that in traditional classes, students works under supervision of teachers so that it is very easier for them to check out whether their students still keep doing assignments or not. Furthermore, attending face-to-face education could improve the ability to perform in front of crowds so much that if you only stay at home, you cannot get it. Personally, despite of many such credible achievements of distance education, I think that it is only suitable for undergraduate or postgraduate courses but high schools or under high schools because of students there are too young to be self-discipline to learn online without any aid of adults.
In conclusion, while I accept that distance learning has it own benefits to people. However, I still believe that traditional classes cannot be replaced due to its unique advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-23 | huynhthithuyduong | 84 | view |
- Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments To what extend do you agree or disagree 93
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in diffirent countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development? 67
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in diffirent countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development? 67
- The money spent by government on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals.To what extend do you argee or disagree. 78
- Many people say that family is the most powerful influence on a child’s development. However, some people suppose that other factors (such as music, friends,…) have a great influence on children.” Discuss both views and give your opinions. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
... I accept that distance learning has it own benefits to people. However, I still be...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07558139535 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99785843879 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584302325581 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1829422895 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225246913378 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617764573598 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525870710292 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116833140063 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459568731676 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.