Employers should give longer holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree?
It is frequently noted, in most parts of the world, that job motivation is a driving force for high performance. Although some assert that granting longer leaves is necessary, I bitterly counter to this standpoint for the following objective reasons.
The greatest drawback of a long leave is a loss of concentration after it. Not only it is difficult for people to focus on their duties when back to work but also they have a strange feeling of fatigue and desire to rest more. For instance, the government of the Russian Federation grants longer holidays in winter and almost one month in spring. Unfortunately, it comes to no good, because some individuals in this country are highly addicted to alcoholism and are not eager to work. As a result, it should be mentioned that giving longer leaves is an unsuccessful decision as it takes time to focus on the referral tasks.
An alternative belief is that more leisure time may result in stagnation at work regarding incomplete or collected tasks. To be more precise, some working spheres require the presence of dexterous specialists who cannot be replaced by someone else, especially for a long term. To illustrate, doctors may not have longer holidays, otherwise, they will lose the pace of learning new information in order to treat illnesses and tackle with specific hurdles or will have more tasks to do. Consequently, employers should take into account that unless the specialist has prolonged holidays the assignments will be accumulated thereby ceasing the performance.
In contrast, opponents claim that the issue has a conspicuous advantage. The merit of being on a longer vacation is that employees will spend a bunch of time with their nuclear family. It is beneficial, for example, to mend ties with family members organizing sightseeing trips or picnics or to devote their time on nurturing children. Thus, this can bring about an immaculate outcome for people who spend most of their time working. However, excessive days off lead to exorbitant expenditures of a family budget and a person has to come back to the duties in the long run and take to the working climate again.
Having analyzed both perspectives, I can conclude that the more holidays people are provided the more troubles it causes both to employers and a working force. If employers grant days off in moderation they will circumvent the abovementioned loss of centralization at work and business stagnation.
Comments
Cannot understand what else
Cannot understand what else do I need to get at least 7.0 on writing. What's wrong with my writing?
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
the Unique words percentage is not outstanding, look:
Unique words percentage: 0.556930693069 0.561755894193 99% => OK
You put 404 words, but around 315 words are enough:
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
so try to put less content to get higher score.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 404 350
No. of Characters: 1997 1500
No. of Different Words: 223 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.483 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.943 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.824 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.918 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.279 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.528 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.033 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08415841584 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90421120129 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556930693069 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4136070457 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1394542129 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396269951653 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376241527412 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070928844707 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156022563396 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.