The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip, and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip, from 2009 to 2011.
The graph shows the amount of tourists arriving in a particular country for a short trip, and the amount of people leaving that country for a short trip, from 2009 to 2011.
The amount of arrivals increased and decreased through different periods of time. It hit a peak in October 2010, when the number of tourists was approximately 520 thousand people.
On the other hand, the amount of resident departures has sharp increase through all period of time. We can see a huge difference between the start point, when the number of people was about 550 thousand, and in the end, when it is about 660 thousand of people. Nevertheless, there is a huge difference between the number of visitor arrivals and resident departures. The lines of the graph don't cross at all. In June 2011 the number of departures is about 1,5 times bigger, than the number of arrivals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-28 | Iroshan464 | 79 | view |
- The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip, and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip, from 2009 to 2011. 61
- The table below gives information about the participation of 11 14 year olds by gender in extreme sports in the UK in 2003 72
- The charts below provide information about energy generation by fuel type in Florida in two separate years 76
- The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip from 2009 to 2011 74
- The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip from 2009 to 2011 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...partures has sharp increase through all period of time. We can see a huge difference between t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...dent departures. The lines of the graph dont cross at all. In June 2011 the number o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 711.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56059888828 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4095086876 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.875 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371412266408 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13719181429 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187953093104 0.0843802449381 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271227407271 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.240388871305 0.0819641961636 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.