topic: shortening the employees workweek to 4 days instead of five days
The reading and the lecture are both about the employee’s workweed and payment. Whereas the reading supports the shortening of employees week work to four days instead of five days and pay the employees 80% of their original salaries. The lecturer casts doubts on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
Firstly, the reading stats that the shortened workweek would increase the company’s profits because employees would be more comfortable and rested, therefore fewer errors in their work would be made. However, the lecturer disputes this points. He states that the shortening of workweek would affect the economy of the companies negatively because the companies would have to pay the same amount of money for the employees’ health insurance even if they work four days instead of five. He also claims that training other employees to replace the original employees on the fifth day would cost the companies more money.
Secondly, the reading suggests that by shortening the workweek employees would have more free time to improve the quality of their lives. The lecturer refutes this point. He states that some companies would ask their employees to do the five days’ work in four days and maybe make them work overtime to get the work done. Moreover they companies would raise their expectations on the employees work since they have more time to rest. Furthermore, that would make the employee more tired because of overworking.
Thirdly, and finally, the reading says that the shortening of week work would work in the favor of individuals who choose to work four days instead of five with an 80% salary of their original salary. Nevertheless, the lecturer says that it has a negative effect on the employee himself. He mentions that employees who choose this option would have problems advancing in their careers and they might lose their jobs since they risk decreasing their job’s stability in comparison with full time employees. In addition, they will not be able to get promotions like a five days employee since the companies would prefer a five days worker who provides continuous coverage to the companies.
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 73
- topic: shortening the employees workweek to 4 days instead of five days 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books When a movie is based on a book some people prefer to read the book before watching the movie Other people prefer to read the book only after they have watched the movie Which do you prefer and 66
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...hem work overtime to get the work done. Moreover they companies would raise their expect...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'company'
Suggestion: company
...ime to get the work done. Moreover they companies would raise their expectations on the e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 489, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...job's stability in comparison with full time employees. In addition, they will not b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15536723164 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64002207501 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454802259887 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.922298841 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0625 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334426514523 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130152406877 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124551087068 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25731068866 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349711324855 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.