Governments have the option to spend the money of tax payers on different projects. Some may prioritize spending the money on enhancing then internet infrastructure, however, some others would consider improving the public transportation system. Although both of those projects are important, I feel allocating the budget for supporting the public transportation is more of a priority because of various reasons
To start with, spending money on public transportation allows people to save time. Many people are reluctant to use public transportation because they fear that they might not arrive to their jobs on time. Spending more money on public transportation instead of internet would allow an accurate departure of buses and trains. For example, I drive to work often Because my bus does not depart on its schedule, I think twice before I take the bus to work. Thus, I prefer to use my car.
In addition, allocating more budget to enhance public transportation creates a cleaner environment. The emission of carbon dioxide released from car engines pollute the air. For example, in china the pollution level of air is far above the standard limits. It is estimated according to environmentalists that air quality index reaches up to 200 which is considered the worst in the world. If the government of china enhances the public transportation system, It would be able to reduce this quality index by at least thirty points, and protect it's people from the harmful effect of air pollution.
Finally, There are private investors in the internet services which can help the government to build good internet infrastructure services. For example, companies like Venison , T-mobile, and Netflix are private companies that are willing to spend money on building a good internet work. However, public transportation is a responsibility of the government. Moreover, public transportation fees has to be affordable inorder to allow rich and poor people to use it.
To sum up, spending more money is a priority for the governments. A good public transportation system reduces car usage and creates cleaner air. Furthermore, it reduces pollution and is healthier for the people.
- using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times 73
- television has positive effect on our society 78
- using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times 71
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than their friends. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: often work
...ses and trains. For example, I drive to work often Because my bus does not depart on its s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m the harmful effect of air pollution. Finally, There are private investors in ...
^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ces. For example, companies like Venison , T-mobile, and Netflix are private compa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, at least, for example, i feel, i think, in addition, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29682997118 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11590200263 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524495677233 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8532448625 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7368421053 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225712596654 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723918861157 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605636009697 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139518579743 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511993879265 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.