The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many children are expected to join team sports to experience cooperation and gain the ability of how to cooperate with others. Although most of the people think that team sports is the best way to cultivate children’s cooperative abilities, I would argue that there are also some other activities including raising money for charity, cleaning the classroom, which can help kids to understand cooperation.
Children are more likely to spend time with their buddies doing some sports together. But these children may not understand what the teamwork is. For example, football has been considered one of the best sports for the kid to play, but it just shows that playing football is a good way to relax and keep in shape. In addition, children who play football just want to play it by themselves and do not want to pass the ball to each. As a result, not only can playing football make these children exhausted, they can not learn the cooperative spirit from playing football as well. So these games may not be suitable for young children and they do not have enough ability to play.
However, understanding cooperation can be obtained by doing some interesting activities which can be done easily by children. For instance, they may choose to work closely together with their peers to raise money for charity when their teachers ask them to do a little project. everyone can realize their own function by doing something which is suitable for them. They can see how teamwork can save time and achieve more compared with what they do on their own
Another example is that children who are required to clean the classroom after school can be a good chance to learn teamwork. In order to finish the task, these children will be divided several groups and complete the allocated work including sweep floors, water floor, throw rubbish, etc. these simple thing can absolutely be done easily and they can also understand that cooperation can bring them many other things like time-saving and happiness.
In conclusion, I do not agree that team sports are the best way to learn cooperation for children, there are so many simple things that can help children gain a better understanding of cooperation.
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Some people think that the government should offer financial support andcare to old people, while others think that people should save money for theirfuture life. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Some people claim that many things that children are taught at school are a waste of time. Other people argue that everything children study at school is useful at some time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people think that children should obey rules or do what their parents and teachers want them to do Other people think that children controlled too much cannot deal with problems themselves in adulthood Discuss both views and give your own opinion 57
- Some people claim that many things that children are taught at school are a waste of time. Other people argue that everything children study at school is useful at some time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Everyone
...achers ask them to do a little project. everyone can realize their own function by doing...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95430107527 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61391386048 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489247311828 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0923841137 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.866666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226869691103 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961176747264 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726053364156 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16497634121 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09054212865 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.