The map below shows three proposed sites for a new hypermarket (A, B and C) in the city of Pellington.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The given map illustrates three potential locations for constructing a new hypermarket in Pellington city.
Overall, it can be seen that three sites locate in different parts of the city. While site A is in the residential area, sites B and C are located the rural region of the city.
The first potential location (A) is situated in the housing area and near to the industrial zone. This makes it accessible to the residents nearby and others who travel by train or cars as it is in close proximity to the railway and traffic-free zone. The second suggested site, B, is located quite far from the residential area as well as the industrial zone. It is only close to a freeway running through the countryside and industry region, which is a disadvantage in attracting city shoppers.
Finally, the last site (C) is in close proximity to the housing and industrial areas as well as the railway passing through the city center. This proposed location seems reachable for not only city shoppers but also suburban ones. Additionally, as it is sited in the countryside, it would able to accommodate a lot of car parking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | xuka576 | 80 | view |
- The map below shows three proposed sites for a new hypermarket A B and C in the city of Pellington Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 80
- The maps below changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that the people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The map shows proposed plans for the development of the old college campus to be completed by 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...who travel by train or cars as it is in close proximity to the railway and traffic-free zone. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...pers. Finally, the last site C is in close proximity to the housing and industrial areas as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of cars'.
Suggestion: a lot of cars
...untryside, it would able to accommodate a lot of car parking.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80310880829 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88200296653 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554404145078 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8508205542 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.7 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141023776308 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613089334661 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559696110067 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109209072977 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634605491015 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.