In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
There must always be a limit on the duration of office that a person holds. This is true for most of the scenarios we encounter these days, including but not limited to politics, government offices and business. As it is said that with power, comes greed, so a person who stays in a position for long will tend to find loopholes in the system and ways to exploit them for his own benefit. Also following this strategy gives chance to others and this prevents from accumulation of power in one hand.
A person who is new to a position will learn how to handle the work that the position requires. For example, the American presidential terms are the best example for this. Since no president can be elected more than twice, he is never able to misuse his powers. Now, if there’s some president who has been elected a few days back, he can, in the first part of his tenure try to make a good reputation among the people who’ve chosen him. With the passage of time, when he learns that there are funds that are left for miscellaneous tasks, which he may use them for his own benefit since he is answerable to none for the miscellaneous funds.
Furthermore, there can be people with more potential than that of the former. If someone stays in the position for long, the people who are more deserving will not get a chance to attain that position. This is of course detrimental since the person after a point of time, will lose interest in the job and not work to his fullest. Young enthusiasm is always a great idea for jobs like mentioned above.
As discussed above, it is always a good idea to keep the people in power changing since it doesn’t make them misuse their authority and also, it allows new talent to keep emerging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | er.vprashant | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | hj84 | 16 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station. 59
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 58
- In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ys to exploit them for his own benefit. Also following this strategy gives chance to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53481012658 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48093798325 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0816153306 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108374264362 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406398285199 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236819253282 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660071340946 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250043397447 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.