The given line chart illustrates figure of people that visited in three London museums which are British Museum, Science Museum and Natural History Museum from June to September of 2013. Data of visitors calculated by thousands.
Overall, a number of consumers of British Museum in summer of 2013 was highest whereas visitors of Science Museum and Natural History Museum was relevant each other.
In between June and July, trends of three Museums was different from each other. Dramatically growth of visitors in British Museum was observed in from June to July and figure of visitor rose from 600 to about 750 while visitors of Natural History Museum significantly decreased from approximately 550 to nearly 375. However, a slight fall of tourists of Science Museum was observed from June to August and number of it declined by 100 to 300.
After that movement, a beginning of a rapidly of British Museum drop started from July to August to 500, and then number of visitors increased by about 150. An unchanged number of visitors of Natural History Museum was observed between July and August. In between August and September, upward trends of visitors of science and Natural History Museum was nearly.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Recently some office workers have begun to work from home instead of commuting to an office each day and this idea is growing in popularity What in your opinon are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend of working from home 64
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06532663317 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50702908206 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452261306533 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9307331758 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327323366173 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163145343291 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627108972207 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232781208824 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551467503006 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.