The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A large number of solutions are proposed by international experts in an attempt to mitigate global environmental issues. While I accept that raising fuel prices might prove efficient in the fight against climate change to some extent, I believe that this is not the best measure to alleviate environmental problems.
On the one hand, it is justifiable that the government should raise taxes on the cost of fuel. Firstly, the passage of such a policy will discourage people from using private means such as cars or motorbikes. The fact that there are less cars travelling on roads means that the amount of exhaust emissions will plunge, which slows down the process of global warming. Secondly, by increasing petrol prices, the dependence on fossil fuels will decrease significantly. Thus, I believe that international bodies should exert pressure on countries to raise fuel prices.
On the other hand, I suppose that there are more effective ways to tackle international environmental issues. First, from a transport policy perspective, it is important to introduce restrictions on private vehicles to cut down on/curb emissions. For example, congestion charges might be of great help if applied appropriately in metropolises, which has been demonstrated by the example of London – the city that became much greener due to this policy. Furthermore, there is a need to find and use alternative energy sources like wind or solar. These are clean, renewable energy sources which have no negative effect on our environment.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that raising fuel cost would be a useful measure but this is by no means the best solution to a wider range of global environmental problems.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 1 82
- The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now. 67
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of solutions are proposed by international...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvironmental problems. On the one hand, it is justifiable that the government sh...
^^
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aise taxes on the cost of fuel. Firstly, the passage of such a policy will discou...
^^
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...or motorbikes. The fact that there are less cars travelling on roads means that the...
^^^^
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
... that there are less cars travelling on roads means that the amount of exhaust emissi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Secondly, by increasing petrol prices, the dependence on fossil fuels will decr...
^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cut down on/curb emissions. For example, congestion charges might be of great hel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20727272727 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99188102473 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4217072933 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.153846154 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179967900674 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610876570002 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542525567944 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110987693362 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348271297476 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.