The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.

The pie charts provide information regarding the comparison in kind of fuels that used to generate electricity in Germany and New Zealand between 1980 and 2010.

Overall, there were the different highest increase for specific resource between Germany and New Zealand. However, both of these countries had far less demand for natural gas in 2010.

A more detailed look at pie charts reveal that the much used resource in New Zealand was coal, and its proportion rose from 50% to 150%. However, this country did not use nuclear as their fuel in generating electricity. In contrast, there were the highest increase in utilizing nuclear in Germany (from 20% to 155%), while the proportion of coal remained unchanged, 28%.

It is interesting to see that the demand for hydro and petroleum in New Zealand and Germany were contrast. While hydro utilization rose from 30% to 46% in NZ, hydro percentage was far less in Germany, only 7% in 1980 and falling to 2% in 2010. On the other hand, the proportion of using petroleum decreased by 9% in NZ, while in Germany the demand of petroleum grew by 5%. It is worth noting that both countries reduced the use of natural gas in big amount, falling by 26-28%.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2014-01-08 Yora 65 view
2013-10-19 wawanwakawangze 95 view
2013-09-03 Umb221 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Yora :

Comments

fuels that used to generate electricity
'fuels used to generate electricity' or 'fuels that are used to generate electricity'

Sentence: Overall, there were the different highest increase for specific resource between Germany and New Zealand.
Description: The fragment the different highest is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace different with adverb

the much used resource in New Zealand was coal,
Description: can you re-write this sentence?

Sentence: In contrast, there were the highest increase in utilizing nuclear in Germany from 20 to 155, while the proportion of coal remained unchanged, 28.
Description: The fragment the highest increase is not usually preceded by were
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace were with was

Sentence: It is interesting to see that the demand for hydro and petroleum in New Zealand and Germany were contrast.
Description: A verb 'to be', past tense, 2nd person singular or all is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to were and contrast

Sentence: It is worth noting that both countries reduced the use of natural gas in big amount, falling by 26-28.
Description: The fragment is worth noting is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace worth with adverb

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 207 200
No. of Characters: 950 1000
No. of Different Words: 108 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.793 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.589 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.552 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 57 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.1 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.405 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.641 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4