It is argued that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since the second half of the last century, there has been a switch from the traditional manufacturing economy to a knowledge economy. Much of the world has placed a premium on the knowledge and skills one can obtain from higher education. Some academics suggest that university students should widen their study from a limited range of subject orientation to the high complexity of subjects. This proposed change merits serious consideration.
From a social aspect, current employers show a tendency to recruit youngsters who can do a various array of jobs within a single position rather than job specialists. A clerk working for a bank, for example, is required to possess a collection of skills, ranging from those learned in the field of finance, accounting, and economy to those in other relevant subjects, such as management, communication, and sociology. As the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, students who dabble in different specialized areas and have experience in the interdisciplinary study are expected to be in a preponderant position.
From the students' perspective, learning different subjects can be both personally fulfilling and skill- enhancing. Many students tend to perceive it as unwieldy when studying several subjects, they have no experience in. This challenge, if overcome, leaves individuals more room for skill enhancement. For example, extra learning requires students to take in essential information within a time frame. In coping with this task, students must develop outstanding time management skills and show expertise in juggling different jobs at a time. With know-how, they are more adjustable in this fast-changing social setting.
According to the above advantages, learning different subjects does good for university students. Not only does it make students time-conscious and versatile, but also helps students to match the needs of a fast-changing and competitive society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-09 | nguyen0804 | 88 | view |
- Increased life expectancy , a curse or a blessing 11
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- It is argued that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- It is important to maintain a right balance of your work and other respects of one's life such as family and leisure. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 77
- Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...in a preponderant position. From the students perspective, learning different subject...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59661016949 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20436000016 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620338983051 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.852047768 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.066666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 7.25397266985 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155308272599 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501793349429 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718058072984 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940428573188 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298070576996 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.