The table compares 6 regions in terms of the forest area in three years 1990, 2000 and 2005.
Overall, there was a forested land expansion in European and Asian countries while African, North American, Oceanian and South American ones underwent a reduction.
Europe had the largest area of forest, increasing exponentially from 989 million ha in 1990 to over 1 billion ha in 2005. Starting at 576 million ha in 1990, the forest land in Asian dropped considerably in 2000 but soared to 584 million ha in 2005.
A similar pattern was not reflected in other regions. Despite having the second largest area during 15 years, South American suffered the most severe loss in forest land, plummeting by 64 million ha. In 1990, the forest covered 749 million ha in Africa, 41 million ha larger than in North America. However, the position changed afterward since the forest area in the former plunged by 58 million ha in the given period, compared to the latter area which went down but leveled off at 705 million hectares after 2000. Only 2 million ha was lost in Oceania, whose forest land was also the smallest.
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 73
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 74
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001. 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.*includes French, German and Spanish 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77604166667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43294958982 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598958333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4210467379 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126107123755 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617292250626 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264222452937 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773933608904 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264804243966 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.