The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The provided line graph above represents information about the consumption of different sources fuel beginning from 1980 showing predictions until 2030 in the USA.

Overall, has been presented 35 quadrillions units of Petrol and Oil. As shown by the graph about 15 and exactly 20 quadrillions units respectively of Coal and Natural gas. Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydropower depict the smallest registered value around 5 quadrillions units. In 2008 we can see that Petrol and Oil followed by Coal are still growing while Hydropower has been declining. Natural Gas and Solar/Wind rising discreetly and Nuclear is slightly above 5 quadrillions units.

Regarding projections of 2030, Petrol and Oil keep growing with approximate values around 50 quadrillions units, 30 for Coal. Natural gas has been stable from 2015 with 25 quadrillions units continuing stable through 2030. Nuclear and Solar/wind record a slight increase. Hydropower has been stable from 2010 with 4 quadrillions units approximately.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hydropower is declining. Natural Gas and Solar/Wind rising discreetly and Nuclear...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60264900662 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07239092289 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629139072848 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7590322423 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136456263409 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556203463973 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759818936198 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129829017446 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991554025997 0.0819641961636 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.