The diagram of 2008 provides an overview concerning the information about energy consumption by fuel in USA between 1980 and 2030.
Overall, it can be seen that least significant level of energy consumed by Nuclear, Solar and Hydropower over the period.
Started from 35 quadrillion units in 1980, the amount of petrol and oil consumption was fluctuating until it reached to 33 quadrillion units in 1995. Then it sharply increased to almost 40 quadrillion units in 2005 and expected that it will continue to grow until it reaches to nearly 47 quadrillion units in the year 2030.
In the first 10 years of the period, consumption of coal was increasing gradually from 16 quadrillion units to 17 quadrillion units. After the year 1990 it experienced a sharp growth until it reached to nearly 23 quadrillion units in 1995 and later it remained constant up to the year in 2005 and it is projected that the consumption level will gradually rise over 25 years until it reaches nearly 30 quadrillion units and be second highest.
In the year 1980 the amount of Natural Gas consumption was 20 quadrillion units. After fluctuation over 28 years it reached to 21 quadrillion units in 2008 and it is expected that it will experience a sharp improvement until it reaches 24 quadrillion units in 2014 and remain constant up to the year of 2030.
On the other hand, energy consumption of Nuclear, Solar and Hydropower started from 4 quadrillion units in 1980 and among these fuels Nuclear steadily increased to 6 quadrillion units in 2005 and it is expected to remained constant till 2030 whereas after some little fluctuations the amount of energy consumption by Solar and Hydropower remained constant till 2005. It is expected that the amount of energy consumption of Solar will continue with 6 quadrillion units till 2030 while Hydropower will continue with 3 quadrillion units in the same period.
- The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000. 67
- The two pie charts below show changes in world population by region between 1900 and 2000.Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features, and make any relevant comparisons. 73
- The table below shows the result of a survey in which people of different age group were asked about their favorite TV program Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City centre from 2003-2012. 67
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sports or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views an 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 318.0 196.424390244 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98742138365 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8779547102 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.396226415094 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8537565462 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.6 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135331760098 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804331874539 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066867356468 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999715050004 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799457907856 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.