A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being thought? Which one do you think is important? Use specific details and examples in your answer.
Teachers play an important role in every student’s life. We learn numerous things from various people, but parents and teachers are the main who teach a lot in anybody's life. Some think that teachers should have good knowledge of the subject to teach children, whereas, others disagree. I strongly believe that if teachers relate to their students then it will help students to learn better for the following reasons: motivates to learn, make learning enjoyable, understand a topic more in detail.
First, teachers’ ability to connect with their students motivates them to learn a better way and perform well in their academic years. It also helps students to remove the barrier between student and teacher relationship. Some students are shy or feel afraid to ask questions in front of all students. If teachers made such an environment in which they can connect to their students, then they will ask the question and clear their doubts. It helps students to get motivated toward their subjects as well. For instance, I have completed my graduation in physical therapy school in India. When I was in the third year of my school, my class coordinator was Satish Prabu. He used to teach us orthopedic subject. His teaching techniques were so nice because he always uses to tech topic in detail from the beginning. Not only that, but he was also good at relating to each and every student in the class. He knows that I like practical so started giving me assignments based on practical to motivate me in this subject, and it worked. I started scoring the highest grades in my class. Moreover, when he distributes checked test paper in class; he calls out each student and explains his/her weak point, and how to improve those mistakes. In that meeting, even students can ask him question or doubts. I got so much motivated towards this subject that I planned to do master in orthopedic after my graduation. I would not have found out that I can be so good in this subject if my professor did not relate to me while teaching ortho subject.
Second, if the teacher has great knowledge of the subject but do not have the ability to relate with the students then the class will become boring; students will not take much interest in the subject. For example, during my physical therapy education, in the final year, we have to study neurology subject. Sushma Parikh used to teach this subject. She was very brilliant, she had a Ph.D. in neurology, on another side, she was not that much good at interacting with students during classes. I was struggling to understand the neurology on top of that my professor made it more boring for me. She used to come in class and read and explain all the writing slides on the projector. She never used to give a practical example or explanation. She was not good at making class fun. It not only affected me but other students as well. We all had a low grade in neurology exam. It made me one image in my mind that neurology is not my subject.
In conclusion, teachers should have knowledge about the subject, but it is not sufficient. Based on my experiences, I strongly believe that teachers should have the ability to relate with students because it inspires students towards learning, they can grasp knowledge efficiently, and it makes learning more fun.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-22 | ankitapatel | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Parents are more involved in children’s education than were parents in past. Use specific example and reasons to explain 83
- A large number of students feel more excited about classes in which they can openly talk to the teacher, and the lectures are at a minimum. On the other hand, some students believe that a class that includes more lectures and less open discussions is a be 60
- Summarize the pint made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed in the reading passage.As early as twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were nota 3
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific examples to support your answers. 93
- The wide spread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today’s world? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...nts then it will help students to learn better for the following reasons: motivates to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'ask' instead.
Suggestion: ask
...nnect to their students, then they will ask the question and clear their doubts. It helps studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 742, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ive a practical example or explanation. She was not good at making class fun. It no...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 84.0 43.0788530466 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2741.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 572.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79195804196 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61720877543 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 827.1 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 26.0 9.59856630824 271% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8105382377 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0606060606 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247090175768 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649622234032 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525164301108 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168302930616 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150319898596 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.