Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development?
Marriage had been a sacred Institution. However, of late it is being made a larger than life affair, that too on a grander scale. I personally believe that it’s a harmful development for the entire humanity. This essay would analyse, as to why marriages held on such lavish scales would rake a havoc on the society?
The most compelling reason behind marriages becoming such expensive affairs is that everyone loves to flaunt their wealth, their power and their status. Since the affluent begin the trend and the poor gullible simply emulate their celebrations on account of illiteracy. Take for example, Laxmi Narayan Mittal, the richest Indian steel magnate settle in the UK. He had an opulent wedding ceremony for his daughter held at the grandest locations with an array of celebrity guest lasting for weeks, moreover the expenditure of this kind of wedding amounted to a whopping amount of a couple of 100 crores. Yet, the saddest part of this fairy tale wedding was that this marriage also ended up in a divorce in a short span of four months. This kind short-lived happiness does not justify the purpose behind it.
I am against these kind of plush weddings, for the simple reason that Marriage can be organised in an economical way too, and still it can be full of sweet memories. After all marriage is a private affair and the main purpose of marriage is to celebrate the occasion of a blissful journey of togetherness. For instance, lately an Indian Maharashtrian couple had ditched the idea of a big fat Indian wedding and donated all their savings to charity. So they stared their journey on the right note by believing in the logic of sharing their joy of having found an ideal soul-mate by contributing to the society. For now, they have got blessings of hundreds of people who have witnessed the generosity. So these kind of individuals who believe in community living, by sharing their joys and sorrows with each other will certainly beneficiaries in the long run.
To summarize. I would reaffirm my faith in a simple but tasteful wedding to make it financially less taxing even for the rich or for the poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-23 | prasanta | 95 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | vadhrahmanjit@gmail.com | 68 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 74
- Some people think that exams are a good way of assessing a student s level Other people believe that they put unnecessary pressure on young learners and tell us very little about their actual ability Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 74
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large no. of young adults compared with the no. of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... the purpose behind it. I am against these kind of plush weddings, for the simple reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an economical way" with adverb for "economical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e reason that Marriage can be organised in an economical way too, and still it can be full of sweet ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 704, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...e who have witnessed the generosity. So these kind of individuals who believe in community...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, after all, as to, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83378746594 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63887982207 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594005449591 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6318411016 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.352941176 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107894171691 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346211159269 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378936389636 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672786601993 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560966353873 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.