The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned accommodation and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The given chart compares the percentage of people who lived in accommodation as owners and tenants in two counties (England and Wales) from 1918 to 2011.
As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of people in rented houses much more than personal ownership of houses from from 1918 to 2011. In 1918, more than 20 percent of people in England and Wales lived in their own houses whereas the percentage of the families as tenants was average 80 percent. Over the years, differences them decreased and coming to 1961, 40 percent of families lived in their own houses and 60 percent of family was considered as tenants.
In 1971, the percentage of people in owned accommodation and rented one showed equal number. The following decades, the number of the people who lived in personal belongings was much more than people in rented houses. They showed 60 and 40 percent in 1981, about 30 and 70 percent in 1991, 2001, 2011 respectively.
In conclusion, from 1918 to 1961 more British and Welsh people lived as tenants. On the other hand, there was equal number of them, as well as, for the next years the people who lived in their properties dominated compared to tenants.
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying in their career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying in their career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
... more than personal ownership of houses from from 1918 to 2011. In 1918, more than 20 per...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
..., the number of the people who lived in personal belongings was much more than people in rented hou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75609756098 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47844245001 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458536585366 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1506505468 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242355554887 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123516943256 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118024586098 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17623676079 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110086657663 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.