All the well grown systems in the present day world are derived from the erudite of the leaders across various fields.
Contribution of these perspicacious leaders get stemmed, if power is taken away within a short span. History also suggests that replacement reflects progression but this would be short term development. Therefore, for any system in order to ascend in the long term, its astute leadership should not be forced to give up.
Steve Jobs, ex-CEO of Apple, revolutionized smart electronics thereby leaving a huge impact on the way we use them. During the first 5 years of his term as CEO of reincarnated Apple Company only Mac laptops were out in the market, if he would had stepped down as CEO at that crucial time there would not have been iPhone , iPod and iPad, which raised their market share to 700 billion dollars making it the world's top company. As is the case with Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the world right now, started his company as an online portal for book exchanges transformed the company into a monopoly in delivery market and still working hard to culminate the legacy.
Other major problem is supplanting the existing leadership with ineligible one. This brings the ideas of the former to moot and vicissitudes of the latter leads to dissolution. Many companies such as IBM, DELL etc., kept on changing their CEO which plummeted their market share during the early 21st century.
Apart from the negative effects, restricting the term to 5 years or any for that matter, also brings different idealogy that govern the system imparting a well diverse effect to keep up with the ever fast changing world. There are many examples where a leader's ideas makes the system stagnant within a fleeting period, which reduces the productivity of his system, in such cases a new system might alleviate such situation.
From the above views, though frequent change in power ameliorates the system in few cases, in most of the cases and to make a lasting impact on the world the author's statement does not stand strong.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-15 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree ? Childhood is the happiest time in a person`s life. Include reasons and examples to support your opinion. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ership should not be forced to give up. Steve Jobs, ex-CEO of Apple, revolutioni...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...al time there would not have been iPhone , iPod and iPad, which raised their marke...
^^
Line 10, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... make a lasting impact on the world the authors statement does not stand strong.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88538681948 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50921729401 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627507163324 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4894688256 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.153846154 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727212842693 0.243740707755 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024488273945 0.0831039109588 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266629598745 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0336869636076 0.150359130593 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277787730106 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.