The table compares the proportion of expenditure on various products and service spent by Irish, Italian, Spanish, Swedish, and Turkish in 2002.
Overall, residents in all five countries spent much more on food, drinks, and tobacco than other items whereas leisure and education had the lowest percentage of spending.
Food, drinks, and tobacco were the largest spending components in all five countries. 34.14% of Turkish consumer purchase went on these items, followed by Ireland with 28.19%. Compared to the two aforementioned nations, others had a much lower proportion, but accounted for over 15%, from 15.77% (in Sweden) to 18.8% (in Spain).
The percentage was significantly less on the two other categories. Regarding clothing and footwear, only 9% was recorded in Italy, where citizens spent most on those items among countries, 7.36% lower than its expenditures on food, drinks, and tobacco. Meanwhile, Sweden showed the lowest percentage, at 5.4% while other nations were represented relatively equally in the proportion of expenditure. The amount of spending on Leisure and Education were the least, ranging from 1.98% in Spain to 4.35% in Turkey.
- The charts below compare five different countries showing the electricity used measured in megawatts or mw in a typical hospital during one week and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week The last chart sho 94
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 78
- The table gives information about the underground railway systems in 6 countries. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998. 78
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... had the lowest percentage of spending. Food, drinks, and tobacco were the large...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46111111111 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78627035105 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627777777778 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7855770571 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101830755323 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403733795375 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358141655656 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665424440814 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021473125975 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.