In the future, students may have a choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice.
Nowadays the newest scientific achievements have impacted all aspects of our life including educational methods. As result, sooner or later traditional school education may compete with the education given at home by using such modern technologies as computers and television. If I could have a chance to make a choice between these two methods for my children I would prefer a traditional one for a number of reasons.
To begin with, technologies cannot completely replace traditional school methods because always an effective educational process requires a live teachers’ feedback. Teachers and pupils must see each other, properly perceive each other’s body language, and have ability to listen and express their own ideas. These are all necessary attributes of an effective study process. No one can deny that even most sophisticated videoconference tool cannot fully replace live talk.
Moreover, students, having home education through technological means, may face serious challenges in their future career development. Even if it had been possible to organize a study process using modern technologies, it would have been impossible to follow this method with work matters. It is a mater of fact, that almost all types of work links with daily communications, conversations, negotiations, and networking. A person who wants to succeed must have these skills, which easily can be gained in traditional school.
Finally, completely replacing traditional schools may affect our society’s values. Over the centuries humankind has co-existed together. And a traditional school is the first step for schoolchildren to associate themselves with their own community and people around. This is not only formal system to gain knowledge and skills, but also way to learn about mutual rights and responsibilities within a society. Children pick up these values indirectly only in traditional school.
To summarize, the new IT technologies are rapidly being introduced in all spheres of our life. And there is a chance that one day technologies may replace traditional schools allowing children to study at home. However, these innovations unlikely can replace traditional methods because they lack live feedback, may affect future development of students, and may negatively impact traditional values in our society.
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- In the future, students may have a choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice. 89
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 78
- It is generally believe that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these view 89
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'centuries'' or 'century's'?
Suggestion: centuries'; century's
...ect our society's values. Over the centuries humankind has co-existed together. And ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65056818182 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17487955903 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9087693317 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.684210526 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5263157895 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218528838804 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648512715988 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696411545612 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127879108773 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691205301287 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.