Countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime. To what extent do you agree?
Over the recent years, the ways in which criminal activities could be performed are increased exponentially. Due to this, most of the nations are facing troubles in regards to the raise in crime rate. Several people anticipate that the only way to overcome crime issues is to have huge police force on the streets around the societies. What are the positives of having officers on the roads? What could be the alternatives to reduce the crime? A thorough scrutiny of the above will lead to an insightful response.
While it is convenient to adopt one aspect over the other, I prefer to present a balanced ergo objective assessment. In my opinion, police officers all around in increased number will surely be useful. However, there are few other options which could be beneficial for the society. The subsequent two paragraphs will detail both aspects extensively.
First and foremost, criminals will be frightened by the strict police security and law around them. Due to harsh punishments, criminals will think of consequences before committing any crime as chances of getting caught is higher. For instance, an article published in NewYork times says that the crime rate in cities has dropped drastically due to fear, where number of officers on duty are more.
On the contrary, use of cutting-edge technology and extremely strict laws are some alternatives which will help to reduce crime. Facial recognition and fingerprint scanner could be useful to catch the criminals easily and fast. Strict surveillance cameras all around the areas for security will eventually deter the criminal acts. Increased in employment opportunities will help improve people their life goals and motivate them to become good citizen. For instance, Cambridge University published a letter about the decreased criminal rate of Mumbai due to improved tourism and employment options.
Keeping all of the above-mentioned facts in mind, increasing terror about strict punishments by police officers is evident component of our reality. In contrast, use of technology and jobs availability are well worthy of an equivalent consideration. To conclude, as is with most things in life, there are two sides to the matter. Fortunately, in this case, both of these are constructive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-07 | Zahra5604 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | essayevaluation | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | essayevaluation | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | vikramowd | 87 | view |
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important 77
- New stories on TV and in Newspapers are often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is you opinion about this? 84
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opi 56
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets. There is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.Discuss both these views and give you opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...most of the nations are facing troubles in regards to the raise in crime rate. Several people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 9, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rism and employment options. Keeping all of the above-mentioned facts in mind, increasi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, while, as for, for instance, in contrast, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29444444444 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91333142639 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4197127152 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6363636364 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222816013235 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622030228723 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665088313391 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124605945592 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105406980865 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.