A controversial debate which is raised about early childhood's cognitive abilities. Some groups of people hold the view that early childhood life is not fulfilling for young adults. However, the other groups may take an opposite point and believe that is more fulfilling. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter groups and fell that children less than 12 years of age can do marvelous things that might impact their future life.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that parent who take good care of their kids at this young age can improve their future performance. Children at young age have tremendous capabilities. They can perform many tasks which adults are unable to perform. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is the language skills learning capabilities. Children are able to memorize not only vocabulary, but also grammar, and pronunciation. Thus, this makes them as skillful as native speakers. This type of skill may be hard on adults who are just starting learning the language.
The second reason which deserves some words here is that children can learn to communicate with others at amazing speed. Although such skills may be hard on adults, children find it very easy. For instance, children who go to kinder garden, often find themselves playing involuntarily with other kids, and in no time they start talking to a bunch of friends. Ultimately, they become extroverted and are able to build a big network of friends as they grow up.
Although the aforementioned reasons are first to cross my mind, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle point which is worth to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshingly, intelligible statistics of a new study published in the American pediatric Journal. The study revealed that children are capable of accomplishing twice as much tasks as adults. This study was conducted on 120 children from different schools to prevent any bias.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that children are capable of performing outstanding tasks beyond human capabilities. Those tasks would not only dazzle the parents, but make them proud of their accomplishments.
- Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss the danger of glass on birds. While the reading state that there are many solutions to prevent injuries to birds. The lecture refutes this, by saying that these solutions not effective to prevent birds fro 76
- Do you agree with the statement that teachers have had more value in the past than today 70
- Some students like to work in groups with other students when doing assignments and projects Other students prefer to work independently Which do you prefer 87
- Integrated writing (TPO 44) 73
- learning from reading is more educational than learning from watching television programs 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... children who go to kinder garden, often find themselves playing involuntarily wi...
^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...n are capable of accomplishing twice as much tasks as adults. This study was conduct...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13387978142 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84673362344 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587431693989 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7282828127 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4090909091 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0782174921242 0.236089414692 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0202385491987 0.076458572812 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337037015593 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426811828222 0.150856017488 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418070466335 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.