It is true that movies and tv programmes are becoming an important part of everyone's life. Mostly individuals argue that foreign movies and tv programmes should be purchased which is good for a nations culture, while others opine that domestic movies are much better than foriengn. In this essay, I will discuss both views as well as my opinion in the upcoming paragraph.
Hollywood movies and programmes are gaining more popularity because of various advantages. To begin with, international television are one of the best source of keeping track on what is currently happening around the globe, which is unavailable on the domestic channels. For instance, BBC channel of the USA, which is aired 24 hours a day, enabling people of any country to access these channel at a convenience to be aware of up-to-the minute news.
Moreover, foreign programmes are a good source of information which provides a information about the culture and tradition of another country. In addition, with the help of foreign movies, youngsters can easily grab new things and also gain a specialization in different language by focusing on particular language. Furthermore, importing foreign products is very beneficial to make strong bondings with another states.
On the other hand, locally produces products are better because of certain reasons. Firstly, domestic channel always doing more efforts to save a culture of a country which shows a variation among different states. Secondly, masses are taking keen interest in these programmes because of understanding. Thirdly, to provide a job opportunities to humans by participating in different characters is very helpful to reducing unemployment rate in home country.
According to my own perspective, with the advancement of technology, individuals have more curiosity to watch a Hollywood or Bollywood movies which changes their way of thinking and also put more attraction towards a western culture, but lost their own culture is a bad thing. So, never forget our culture.
- People doing dangerous sport activities like scuba diving and bungi jumbing, they should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers not risk their lives to save people.Do you agree or disagree. 73
- People nowadays change careers and place of residence very often. Is it a positive or negatiive development 88
- More people are spending their free time watching movies, why is this? Is it a good or bad? 79
- Employers should give longer holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree? 73
- Task 2: Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 83
Hlo sir, bbc is a one channel
Hlo sir, bbc is a one channel of the USA. That's why m using channel instead of channels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...n this essay, I will discuss both views as well as my opinion in the upcoming paragraph. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (BBC) must be used with a third-person verb: 'channels'.
Suggestion: channels
...he domestic channels. For instance, BBC channel of the USA, which is aired 24 hours a d...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...od source of information which provides a information about the culture and tradi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.982020938 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7735390196 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5333333333 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229838971004 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639681329004 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510406808294 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111068474334 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702913444513 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.