The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.
The figure elucidates the rates of household recycling in the UK, France and Germany from 2005 to 2015. At the first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred in the number of household recycling in France and the UK.
To begin with the UK and France, 2005 to 2015 witnessed a tremendous upsurge in the amount of household recycling in the UK in which it stood at two-tenths in 2005 and achieved at well beneath 6 in 10. Following the same pattern as the UK, the percentage of household recycling in France jumped over the following period, soaring to just above three-fifths in 2015.
In contrast, there was a dramatic drop in the total of household recycling in Germany between 2005, which approximately constituted at a half, and 2013, which roughly made up at less than a third. Erratically, it climbed enormously to just under four-tenths by the end of the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | livevanzz | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Johnysingg | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
- Process the lifecycle of a butterfly 64
- In the past, sporting champions used to be motivated primarily by the desire to win a match or to break world records. These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous.What message does this send to young peo 78
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 73
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 77
- The changes in the layout of the Woodward university. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79487179487 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82132855337 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1650197307 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243281170013 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127081549046 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799357143359 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169633420704 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048565484565 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.