The increase in mobile phone use in recent years has transformed the way we live, communicate and do business. Mobile phones can also be the cause of social or medical problems. What forms do these problems take?
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of mobile phones?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Using the mobile phone has altered daily life significantly, which may lead to disturbance in all aspects of existence such as medical or social relations. I suppose the drawbacks outweigh the advantages. This issue will be analyzed in this assay.
In parallel improve technology, applying of mobile phones has developed. Although it contributes to various parts of life, its positive effects are undeniable. Via this device, accessing to numerous applications is provided which stimulates lots of tasks. For instance, waiting in long queue of banks has been declined since mobiles are equipped with bank applications whereby you are able to perform many tasks by this device. Moreover, through mobile availability to all individuals is prepared especially important ones who plays vital role in life like doctors. Ringing them and having connection with those people was not simple, if mobile had not been invented.
On the other hand, naysayers believe that plain availability to people reduce real communications. When talking in every situations is feasible, people will not tend to spend time to visit each other face to face. This issue makes great gap gradually. Furthermore, mobiles have detrimental rays that is dangerous for all existences, human and animal. Scientifics declare that these rays are annoying for birds as well as mankind. Through these effects are not visible, they are not mentioned.
All in all, I suppose extraordinary usage of this kind of technology has disturbed routine life since it decreases individual connection and motivates machine life style along with numerous negative results on health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | igasmr | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | geetha balasubramaniam | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | VivianL | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Sarab.rathor4@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | hamzamanzoor | 61 | view |
- You are employed full-time and also doing a part-time evening course. You are not able to continue the course 56
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more prons to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? 78
- ou recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time Write a letter to the editor In your letter Say which edition and when did the article appear Explain why you lost contact with your fri 70
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly. This is causing problems for you and your neighbours. Write a letter to the local council. In your letter:– Describe how the rubbish collection system is not work 78
- you are renting an apartment and the neighbors are disturbing you. write a letter to your landlord explaining what the problem is, what do you do to solve the problem and what action you want the owner to take. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, i suppose, kind of, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43700787402 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87483808751 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673228346457 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6257791931 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3125 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111016386631 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363456476993 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426872059985 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676127553348 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534069925423 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.