The line chart : Japanese tourists travelling abroad.
The bar chart : Australia’s share of Japan’s tourist market
The figures elucidate the number of Japanese holidaymakers who travelled overseas and the amount of Australia share to Japan’s visitor market from 85 to 95. At first glance, it is evident that in the bar chart, the total of the tourists who come from Japan experienced a dramatic growth over the entire period, and in line graph, it experienced a sharp decline for two times.
To begin with the bar chart, there was immense progress for the number of Japanese holidaymakers to travel abroad in which it stood at just above 4 millions in 85 and achieved at well over 10 millions in 90. Over the following year, it decreased sharply less than the previous year, and erratically, it jumped, soaring to well across 14 millions by the end of the period shown.
In accordance with the line graph, 85 to 89 witnessed an immense increase for the share of Australia for Japan’s visitor market in which it finished approximately at well above 4 in 100 in 89. Unfortunately, it plunged for two times in the next 6 years and ended at six-hundredths in 95.
- Bar Chart : home and international students, 2010 – 2012. 73
- The maps show the changes of the town 1920 2010 84
- Government should focus spending only on public services, not waste on the arts. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Line graph : Recycling rate for selected materials :1982 - 2010 78
- The line chart : Japanese tourists travelling abroad.The bar chart : Australia’s share of Japan’s tourist market. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72972972973 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87375469266 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1244723033 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273586906173 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120981910281 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933942496449 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181686663602 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102007577947 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.