Women should give up their jobs and go back to their traditional roles of home maker in order to reduce world’s unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In order to decrease the total of the unemployment in the world, females are supposed to stop for working and go back to their conventional roles. In accordance with this argument, this essay will explain the point of view of this issue and also put forward my perspective in the following paragraphs.
In regard to the statement above, I do appreciate to the assumption and firmly believe that they realized the existence of females for working worsens the amount of the males unemployment. Nevertheless, I tend to oppose this thought and consider that this attempt is going to produce unwanted impacts for numerous females across the globe.
According to my perspective, as a value of equality has been emphasis, we are unable to think and produce something which is going to render a profit merely for males, therefore, we have to consider everything from different sides and the impact of it. In accordance with this influence, there are several consequences which related to the statement above. It, first and foremost, is going to worsen the number of females unemployment around the earth in which it will create other negative impacts to individuals' life. Second but not less crucial, it is apparent that this effort, additionally, is solely going to render a benefit for males, by this thought, it will make females feeling unappreciated by males and making the relations between these two genders getting worst.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that in order to create an equal positive influence for all persons, the endeavours of stopping females from their vocation is not necessary to do. Thus, the authority of every nation has to produce a strict law which related to this issue in order to create a better outcome for both genders.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 84
- The maps show the changes of Springfield primary school in 2005 – 2015. 73
- The maps shows the changes in Cambridge from 1995 to present. 73
- Bar chart : amount spent on consumer goods (Belgium, Spain, Austria and Britain). 78
- Process : How Biogas is produced. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...pective in the following paragraphs. In regard to the statement above, I do app...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'males'' or 'male's', 'malis's'?
Suggestion: males'; male's; malis's
...s for working worsens the amount of the males unemployment. Nevertheless, I tend to o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97627118644 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77627739491 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549152542373 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8856186621 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.8 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902449054131 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434253011129 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532826144045 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657476333446 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029991384639 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.