The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The bar chart provides information about the proportion of frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the years 2003-2013.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of Americans ate unhealthy meals in restaurants between once a week or once, twice a month in all three years, while junk food was eaten every day or never by the tiny minority of folks.
It can be seen from the graph that the biggest proportion of frequency of people, more than a quarter, opted to eat unhealthy food once a week or once or twice a month during the given period. In contrast, roughly 5% of folks reported eating junk food in restaurants every day or never in 2003 and the proportion of this was followed by a 1% decrease in 2006. However, the number of inhabitants, who ate junk food a few times a year, increased to 15% in the year 2006 and remained the same over the next 7 years. In addition, the proportion of frequency of eating fast food among people who were eaten fast food at least several times a week made up nearly a fifth in the years 2003-2013.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 61
- some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 67
- Given two bar chart shows destination of undergraduates and postgraduates student of the UK,other than full-time work in the year of 2008. 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both the 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, at least, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48453608247 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52602565538 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.7608837515 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253404960712 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136933431991 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091814145552 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197740586531 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751403423784 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.