The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The two pie charts provide information about the distributions of one university British in England capable to speak other languages than English in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the vast majority of students was able to speak more than one language and the most widely spoken language was Spanish.
It can be seen from the charts that the proportion of students spoken only Spanish as well as English was the highest in 2010 and 2010 (30% and 35% respectively). In contrast, the number of British students talking by the German language in 2010 stood at the same percentage as in 2010. However, the percentage of students spoken French decreased by 5% in the 2010 year compared to the 2000 years. In addition, the proportion of students speaking by another language or two other languages increased by 5 percentages during the ten years period. Also, British students able to speak only English decreased by twice as many in 2010 as in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Tejas Dalwadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Tejas Dalwadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | BlackDelta | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | Adithya999 | 67 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...peak only English decreased by twice as many in 2010 as in 2000.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83734939759 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62244767705 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6109032903 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465325745012 0.215688989381 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224057114677 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853313181333 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305295693309 0.15604864568 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102087069685 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.