The pie charts illustrates the proportion of British students who speak other languages besides English at one university in year 2000 and 2010. We could figure some apparent differences easily.
First of all, only 10 percent of the students could not speak another language despite of English in 2010, the number is half of the data in 2000, which means more and more people are bilingual in at least one foreign language, that is the biggest change in this decade. There are also some slight increase and decrease, for example, students who choose French as a second language dropped for 5 percent from 15 to 10 while the proportion Spanish speaker went up from 30 percent to 35 percent, there is no doubt that Spanish is still the most popular choice.
In addition, the percentage of students who speak some small language and who master two foreign languages both experienced an increase of 5 percent, that is a good signal. And it is worth noting that, the group who speak German is the only one in these groups whose data remain the same.
To sum up, we can draw the conclusion that British students had been more willing to learn other sorts of languages than before.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- University should accept equal number of men and women in every subject. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. The say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, second, so, still, while, at least, for example, in addition, no doubt, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74757281553 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37515099658 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592233009709 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.02053466 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.714285714 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.2857142857 5.23603664747 330% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341284700488 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164520201706 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168253826352 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220222616419 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127453697 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.