Nowadays, the debate about gender dais is quite fierce. There is an argument that all subjects in universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students. As far as i am concerned, i disagree with this point of view. The following essay will discuss the reasons i disagree.
First of all, it is impossible for universities to recruit equal number of male and female students. To be frank, boys and girls have different strengths usually. For boys, they are more likely to be interested in majors like engineering and mechanical. Yet for girls, language and nursing might be their hobbies. Therefore, these professions will produce gender imbalances inevitably. If an university insists to accept equal boys and girls for these majors, many students will fail to enter their ideal college.
Secondly, the choice of major is out of the willing of the students themselves, universities have no right to restrict students’ choices. The same sex ratio looks like an equality, however, it is an inequality itself. Students will be confused when choosing a major because they do not know whether this major have more boys or girls.
Admittedly, not all the boys have no talent for language learning. Actually, there are also girls gifted in mathematics. However, individual differences do not represent the whole. Universities should focus on the overall level of knowledge of the students, not the sex ratio. Gender-restricted schools will have difficulty recruiting students who best meet school standards.
From what has been discussed above, i firmly believe that it is impractical and unnecessary to recruit the same number of boys and girls in every subject.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. The say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... of male and female students. As far as i am concerned, i disagree with this poin...
^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ale students. As far as i am concerned, i disagree with this point of view. The f...
^
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ollowing essay will discuss the reasons i disagree. First of all, it is imposs...
^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...roduce gender imbalances inevitably. If an university insists to accept equal boys...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25185185185 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90592318804 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.535570285 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6315789474 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2105263158 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16510163823 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04882891495 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078611694461 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10266576215 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510445691439 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.