Some people hold the opinion that the recycling for waste from homes is not good enough right now, so laws on this need to established. I am going to give the counterargument to that, although let more waste be recycled is absolutely the right thing, making it a legal requirement is not a wise choice for government.
Firstly, I will explain why it is unreasonable to set up the law. It is fair to say that the laws can have short-term effects, as breaking the law often means punishment, From simple criticism education to fines and even arrests, there are many mandatory means to use. Out of fear, people do increase the recycling rate of garbage, but in the long run, people will try to escape the law through some extreme methods, this will only be counterproductive.
So what should the government do? I believe that education, rather than punishment, can help even more. Using new laws to force people to recycle would not change this situation, because the production of rubbish can not be decreased as well as ordinary people know little about garbage recycling. To solve this problem, the authorities should play the role of a guide. On one hand, they need to provide sufficient information about garbage classification for the masses, so that the recycling of trash would be much easier. On another hand, building more garbage disposal station will enhance the efficiency of recycling and in that case, more household trash can be used.
To sum up, law is a way, not an aim. The ultimate goal should be to reduce environmental pollution and save energy, just relying on the law is useless.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- University should accept equal number of men and women in every subject. To what extent do you agree? 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 95
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81227436823 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79711880927 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6219459279 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324318218394 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102198303544 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826202054374 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181362145019 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945325069624 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.