Since recent several decades, human beings have made great progress in diverse aspects, especially in agriculture in our society. However, it is considered that the development of agriculture does not bring enough benefits to the practical situation which is the hunger of people all over the world. This essay will discuss the main reasons of this case and some available method addressing the trouble.
It is obvious that most countries and areas in famine need to face natural problems, such as poor land, harsh climate and so on. While modern technology can deal with them in a huge extent, people in those areas are still in hunger. What caused this situation is a vicious circle. It will cost a large amount of money to solve the environmental issue, but to solve the fund stream, at first, the government must ensure enough labour. Now, here is the problem. Without plenty of food supply, the labour force seems to be a fiction.
Considering the reason mentioned above, there are measures which help to address this vicious circle. Firstly, governments could export their special production and encourage residents to make them. Furthermore, developing another industry, such as travel and transport, seems to be a breakthrough. Because food supply cannot be ensured by themselves, they can import food from foreign countries like Singapore and develop traditional backward agriculture.
All in all, as I argued above, it is surely irreversible that the world experiences serious shortages in terms of food. However, there are certain measures for the human to implement to at least mitigate the issue. Hence, it is vital for every individual to take a collective effort to protect the grave consequence from worsening.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 11
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Q:- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, so, still, while, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18571428571 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73932063677 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660714285714 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7704024998 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179968015378 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512175930514 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486686400232 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959460354903 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511960332052 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.